Undertaker’s Wives Club

From an online auction.
Is it just me, or is the name “Undertaker’s Wives Club” a poorly thought out title for a social group? I mean for any group at all? It doesn’t have a ring of cheery conversation and bonhomie, does it?
The unusual name emblazoned at the top, certainly makes for a highly desirable, collectable image. That is especially so with the stunningly beautiful female subject. The hand tinting and the industrial landscape background add to its desirability, not to mention that it was taken in one of the most famous NYC dance clubs of the 1920s and 30s.
I have two Savoy Ballroom photos in my collection. They have the same background featured, with the year and the event names changing in each. If anyone can tell me what is depicted in this back-drop, I’d be very grateful to hear from you.
The auction for this stunning image is still ongoing. I’ve bid to my maximum and so now must bow out. I can see it going for up to $100 or more.
Sorry you can’t buy it
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too. Thanks Derrick. It went for a whopping $113.50!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amazing image! I hope you get it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sadly, I never had a chance. I bid up as high as I dared to but secretly hoped I’d get outbid as it wasn’t a very wise fiscal decision to join in. It went for more than twice my maximum at $113!!
Are you interested in finger prints and their history without faces attached?Just a random question!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sad you didn’t get it.
I’m somewhat interested in fingerprints, sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll email you about that if I ever get my Ipad in working order! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I also love the mystery of the background image. It seems like an odd choice to use because it looks like an industrial area, however it seems to be in all the photos you’ve put on your blog. I hope someone can figure out what it is and why it was chosen as the backdrop. It is a backdrop, right? I assume it would have to be!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, definitely a backdrop. I had hoped that it was an easily recognisable landmark in the NYC of that era, but no one has commented to that effect. If you take out the people from each of the published photos, there is a lot of it visible, so it surprises me that no one knows where or what it is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I lived in nyc for awhile but I don’t recognize it either. It’s an odd, industrial-looking view, don’t you think? Have you tried asking in the fb photobooth group if anyone recognizes it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Brilliant idea! I will do that at some stage. Thanks Shayne.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a name! Do you think they really were undertakers’ wives?
LikeLiked by 1 person
My guess was yes, and that has been confirmed by another commenter, Liz. She found a reference to the club as a charity and that it was just for African American undertakers’ wives. Part of promoting their businesses through churches, if I understood correctly. Such an amazing piece of history!
Hooray, you used the possessive correctly, Catherine. It always confuses me with plurals and quite honestly I hadn’t noticed they got it wrong until I saw it right in your comment.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s a great name for an all female rock band…
LikeLiked by 3 people
😁😁😁. I agree, Dan! 😊
LikeLike
Beautiful photo. Thanks for giving me an idea for a story…or maybe even a novel. That woman’s eyes tell a thousand stories.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wonderful how a tiny photo can say so much and stimulate imagination, isn’t it, Og? So we have, so far from this post, a name for an all female rock band, a story, a novel, hopefully a haiku (Douglas from Moorezart has reblogged it. He also has a great News Haiku site.) and who knows what else might turn up? 😉
LikeLiked by 3 people
Love the hand-tinting; so delicate. She looks very sweet and composed–very model-like pose.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree Roberta. She appears to have had some experience at posing. Perhaps she was indeed a model? I wonder if it was that people of that era had better posture (reputedly)?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think I remember seeing a post on your other ones. Is this really a photobooth photo, I wonder? I went to ebay and since you reached your limit I ran the bid up. I have a feeling you are right about the $100. I’m currently the high guy @ $51. I really like the photo, I guess we’ll have to see how much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Which reminds me, I have to see the mailman about sending an envelope to Oz.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lord, I hope you didn’t place the winning bid, Ted!! It went for $113!!
It is definitely a pb photo. I guess I’m only sure about that due to having two from the same machine in my collection.
I love looking forward to getting post from you. I’ve a secret photobooth event happening tomorrow. Will private message you . . .
LikeLike
How do I love thee? Let me count the ways. I got up to 60 ways and bailed. Interesting to see the bidding. Last second bid got it. I wonder which one of those early bidders was the AussieLass we all know and love.
I’m really looking forward to your event, Katherine. Have fun today, I know you will be glam.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sent you and email about it Ted! ❤ 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on From 1 Blogger 2 Another.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Douglas! Much appreciated. 😃🌸💕
LikeLike
I found an Undertakers’ Wives’ Charity Club mentioned in the book Black Metropolis on page 457.
Here’s a link to the full text on Internet Archive: https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.7040/2015.7040.Black-Metropolis#page/n489/mode/2up/search/%22undertakers+wives+charity+club%22.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks so much Liz! I wouldn’t have guessed that it was an all African American organisation and a charity to boot. If I’ve understood it correctly, the wives club charity was another way to get the churches behind promoting specific undertakers?
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s the way it appears, yes. I wasn’t surprised at the connection to the funeral industry, as I’d studied a chapter of Jessica Mitford’s expose, The American Way of Death, in freshman composition class, of all places. It was eye-opening but definitely not for the squeamish.
LikeLike
As in Nancy Mitford’s sister? What an extraordinary subject for the daughter of a British Baron to choose to write about!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another Brit, Evelyn Waugh, took a satirical approach to the same subject in his short novel, The Loved One: https://gutenberg.ca/ebooks/waughe-lovedone/waughe-lovedone-00-h.html.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the link, Liz.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Undertakers Wive’s Club” sounds like a novel about the deep south in the 1950’s. Calling Amy Tan!
LikeLiked by 4 people
It absolutely does!
LikeLike
I agree, Stephen and Liz!
LikeLike
I posted a screenshot of the photo on eBay, showing the final price after the bidding ended, in a Facebook group called “photo delight.” This is a group in which people keep track of interesting photos on eBay and what they’ve sold for. Many people were interested in that photo, based on the response to my post. I think it has a combination of unique features that made it very desirable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, very, very desirable. Once I get my Ipad back up and running, when I don’t need to take breaks every fifteen minutes (ARGH!!), I will check out that group. It sounds wonderful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Undertakers’ wives social club? That could be the title for a story… 🙂
LikeLike
She is stunning with a hint of sadness in her eyes. Perhaps she didn’t want people to know she was an undertaker’s wife??
LikeLiked by 1 person
It might’ve been a socially difficult role. Having said that, I have a Brazilian friend who is the daughter of an undertaker. They have an elevated position in their small community. He started a cheap pre-paid funeral plan 60 years ago that guaranteed a lovely service and burial, even if the full amount had not been paid at the time of death. I guess her status might depend on how her community viewed funerals?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm. I never thought of it like that before. Very insightful, Kate.
LikeLiked by 1 person